Below’s example is sourced from Dan’s Presentation from TED.com. You may checkout the full presentation here.
Firstly, try to look at a simple subscription form at Economist.com.
Anything wrong?
There are 3 options here.
- Web subscription for USD 59.
- Print subscription for USD 125.
- Print and web subscription for USD 125.
Now, your immediate attention is drawn to the comparisons of option 2 and 3. What kind of idiot will design this kind of options? It’s so obvious that nobody will ever choose options 2 right?
You’re absolutely right if you think this way. After all, 100 MIT students who were asked to choose amongst the options above, the result is as below:
- Option 1 : 16%
- Option 2 : 0%
- Option 3 : 84%
So, why don’t we just remove option 2?
Well, Dan Ariely, a behavioral economist did exactly that and retest the whole experiment again. This time, with just 2 options, the result came back as :
- Option 1 : 68%
- Option 3 : 32%
WOW! What just happened?
It turns out that when there were 3 options, the option 1 is mostly ignored. Instead, most people will zoom into option 2 (being the lesser intelligence option) and compared it against option 3. Nobody was actually comparing option 1.
Now, let’s start incorporating Option 2 into our life. (Eg. Bring a lesser attractive version of you to the bar and compare it against you. )